3 ms·
>Better performance than C That's a bold, yet generalized statement.
by rl3 10y ago
>Better performance than C
That's a bold, yet generalized statement.
- falcolas 10y agoAnd, from most indications, incorrect. I think it's beat one C program on Alloth's benchmark game in processing time, but has been beat in the others. It performs on par with C++, on the other hand, for what that's worth.
- colemickens 10y agoInteresting reading in this area in case anyone missed it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13268051 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13268051
- steveklabnik 10y agoRemember that the benchmark game is a game, and it has rules. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13267312 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13267312 is a recent thread about Rust and these rules on at least one benchmark. Many of the others boil down to "explicit SIMD isn't in stable yet."
- quotemstr 10y agoThe Java people made the same bold claims back in the day.