>An odd tack for someone who I would expect to be pro-states'-rights From the rest of your comment I'd guess you already know this, but organizations like thes

>An odd tack for someone who I would expect to be pro-states'-rights From the rest of your comment I'd guess you already know this, but organizations like these have no particular affinity for the rights of states. Conservative-funded organizations are only pro-states'-rights when it advances their other agendas -- usually identity politics around race (where "states' rights" has been a dog whistle since Nixon and Reagan), and economically where states with different regulations can promote a race to the bottom that benefits corporations and the wealthy (Delaware's rules on corporations are a good example).