2 ms·
Did they really need to say, "We also have other data about the attack that we're not publishing because it's classified"? Isn't that kind of safe to assume?
by mundo 10y ago
Did they really need to say, "We also have other data about the attack that we're not publishing because it's classified"? Isn't that kind of safe to assume?
- UnoriginalGuy 10y agoI don't think it is safe to assume at all. They laid this at Russia's feet almost immediately and before any investigation was conducted.
- ra1n85 10y agoWhen things like this are used as a pretext to sanction other countries, I will assume nothing and expect data. The bogus weapons of mass destruction in Iraq was enough to convince me that "just trust us" isn't sufficient data.
- y_u_no_rust 10y agoTOP KEK!
- mundo 10y agoFrom the downvotes, I guess the FBI doesn't typically keep information to itself, it just releases it on principle. How nice of them!