4 ms·
Speed is one factor, difference in speed is a more useful measure of the risk of harm. If you're going 15mph on a road marked 35, you are in danger BECAUSE you
by faster 10y ago
Speed is one factor, difference in speed is a more useful measure of the risk of harm. If you're going 15mph on a road marked 35, you are in danger BECAUSE you are slower than the rest of the traffic on that road. Other vehicles expect traffic to go at or near the posted limit, if conditions allow it. Hitting a wall at 15mph is one hazard; getting hit by a car going 20mph faster than you is a bigger hazard.
In Hawaii, because some people tend to drive too slowly and doing so causes crashes, they post the minimum speed below the limit on a lot of roads. Across the US, it is illegal to go more than 15 below the limit in clear conditions.
Once a cyclist has a motor, it seems they are more likely to 'claim' a lane and then they need to keep up or risk being a roadblock. It's less safe either way, and I'm not sure there is a viable solution. Part of the thrill of cycling in traffic, I guess.
- gertef 10y agoMomentum matters as much as speed. Suppose you are doing 35mph on a bike the road and you get sideswiped by a car doing 35mph. The direct impact is negligible, but now you've got angular momentum that is going to send you into another car or the ground at high speed. And even if you are doing 35mph, and claiming a lane, you'll still be passed (often unsafely) by cars doing 40, 50mph. (Source: motorcyclist who can't go fast up hills)