3 ms·
I'm no fan of Obama, but I agree completely. And think your inclusion of Bush 41's actions are on-target. After January 19th, if Trump feels that any of Obama
by MrZongle2 10y ago
I'm no fan of Obama, but I agree completely. And think your inclusion of Bush 41's actions are on-target.
After January 19th, if Trump feels that any of Obama's actions are inappropriate, he can take steps to undo them. But if time is of the essence, then it is better for the sitting President to take action rather than let a bad situation get worse.
I don't know if this case in particular fits the bill, but if you start hamstringing the incumbent, then you might as well swear in the new President the day after the election.
- marcoperaza 10y ago>But if time is of the essence, then it is better for the sitting President to take action rather than let a bad situation get worse. Agreed. But is time of the essence?
- MrZongle2 10y agoWell, that's why I said that I didn't know if this case fits the bill. That's certainly debatable, at least outside of access to any classified material that supports the assertion that Russia was directly involved.
- mdekkers 10y ago> After January 19th, if Trump feels that any of Obama's actions are inappropriate, he can take steps to undo them. That's exactly the point. This is political, not urgent. If Trump (I'm no fan of Trump, or any other politician, really) doesn't roll back these changes, it will hurt his prospects on the way forward he said he wanted to take - better relations with Russia. If he does roll them back, queue howls of outrage from everywhere that Trump is weak and being a pushover to the public enemy number one du-jour. It is a political move, and a petty and small minded one at that.
- solipsism 10y agoOverly principled politicians don't do well in the US system (or perhaps any political system). You might be right but what's the point of being right if you have zero influence? This is what I've learned about US politics anyway.