3 ms·
Yes, good point. I am on Windows XP; you are on Mac and SURPRISE! things look much better for you. I should have mentioned OS in my original post. http://fts
by gamache 16y ago
Yes, good point. I am on Windows XP; you are on Mac and SURPRISE! things look much better for you. I should have mentioned OS in my original post.
http://ftso.net/scribd-chrome5-winxp.gif http://ftso.net/scribd-chrome5-winxp.gif shows what I am seeing (zoomed in for a little more clarity; it still looks bad at regular size).
- robin_reala 16y agoHave you tried turning anti-aliasing on? It’s a system level control in Display Properties I believe (though it’s been many years since I used Windows in anger).
- mikelikespie 16y agoThanks for the feedback. Win XP has a different font renderer than Win 7 which is different than os x's. The fonts look best in win xp with cleartype enabled. We are going to be working on improving the font quality in XP in all modes. It looks like you don't even have font smoothing enabled which. Enabling that will make a huge improvement cleartype or not.
- gamache 16y agoThanks for the tips! I never spent much time making XP look better, I mostly just turn off all the piss-me-off stuff the first day I run the machine, and forget it. I'm glad it was a mixture of XP and PEBKAC causing the output to look bad. Like I hinted before, I am in complete support of your decision to move to HTML5, and I am tickled to see it look so good (on other people's screens ;). EDIT: Wow, yes, ClearType smoothing really takes care of the font appearance.
- naner 16y agoI'm on Ubuntu with Chrome: http://i.imgur.com/qF0xA.png http://i.imgur.com/qF0xA.png
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]