3 ms·
So to make the argument that peoples' jobs are at risk of automation, the author provides anecdotal evidence of a glorified vending machine pharmacy-pill filler
by imjustsaying 10y ago
So to make the argument that peoples' jobs are at risk of automation, the author provides anecdotal evidence of a glorified vending machine pharmacy-pill filler (yes, I know this is not nearly all a pharmacist does, but this was the specific task given in the example), a position that has already been automated by vending machines, self check-out lanes, and robotic pick-and-ships?
Way to pump the industry hype there venturebeat, but I don't think you're going to make the cheerleading squad cut this year.
- mdpopescu 10y agoHis point, in my opinion, is that the only reason the pharmacist isn't already replaced by a (more effective) vending machine is political and that it will be so replaced once most people figure it out.