Unless I missed it in the article the data is all about passing the interview not acutally seeing if any of these things correlate to the employees working out

Unless I missed it in the article the data is all about passing the interview not acutally seeing if any of these things correlate to the employees working out in the 1,3,5 year time spans. With this data you're just biasing towards people who interview well, which, I don't think you actually care about. Well I mean I guess you do if you're a recruiter (if you're a moral recuiter you care about both), but not really if you're an employer.