3 ms·
I was going to say the same thing, except "polyfill for JPEG-2000"
by Eric_WVGG 10y ago
I was going to say the same thing, except "polyfill for JPEG-2000"
- 79d697i6fdif 10y agonah JPEG 2000 isn't quite as nice because some browsers can't natively parse it :) . WebP support literally already exists in all mainstream browsers, it's just a single frame of VP8. And it's still around half the size of regular JPEG Not sure why we're downvoted here, either of these are clearly better options for increasing image download speed