3 ms·
Everyone has a right to prevention of unreasonable search and seizure. It's still up in the air whether going to a third-party to whom you've voluntarily given
by fixermark 10y ago
Everyone has a right to prevention of unreasonable search and seizure.
It's still up in the air whether going to a third-party to whom you've voluntarily given a bunch of information about yourself and asking that third-party to render that information is "unreasonable." It's pretty simple to make a case that it isn't. To wit: there's plenty of legal precedent for compelling a witness to testify against someone; are we to believe that your Amazon logs or your water meter history should share the same privileged status as your attorney, psychotherapist, or priest? "Alexa, forgive me, for I have sinned..."
- pg_is_a_butt 10y agoEveryone has a right to bear arms. turkey used that right, with a single gun and a single bullet, to end a war that billions of dollars of US resources couldn't. Russia backed away, and putin cried. If ANYONE attempts an unreasonable search or seizure: KILL THEM WITH YOUR GUN. the founding fathers EXPECT you to. of course, this is the other side of the same coin... "if you're doing something that someone might kill you over, perhaps you shouldn't be doing it"... as long as we keep killing perpetrators, we eventually won't have to. you are all pussies. you have done this to yourselves. you're completely pathetic. you're all idiots.
- djrogers 10y ago> It's still up in the air whether going to a third-party to whom you've voluntarily given a bunch of information about yourself and asking that third-party to render that information is "unreasonable." It's really not 'up in the air' - it's been settled for over a century, look at banks and phone companies.
- jononor 10y agoTaking an oath/pledge of confidentiality would be interesting business strategy on privacy, especially if it could be used to defend against claims from authorities.