4 ms·
I am curious why you linked to reddit? There is nothing in the discussion (4 comments) that is not in the linked advisory. Looking back through your comment hi
by dfc 10y ago
I am curious why you linked to reddit? There is nothing in the discussion (4 comments) that is not in the linked advisory.
Looking back through your comment history you seem to do this a lot, even linking to discussion pages on reddit with no comments whatsoever and the same link as found in the HN submission.
- koheripbal 10y agoLooks like a bot to me. Literally only pastes links. I'd suspect that some of the websites it links to generate ad-rev, while the wikipedia and reddit links are there to obfuscate the purpose of the bot. It's simple logic. If you notice, both the Reddit and HN source have the same source url.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- pvg 10y agoI'd suspect that some of the websites it links to generate ad-rev Did you find any? The 'simple logic' has to follow from some sort of evidence.
- based2 10y agoHi Could you please refrain from doing that? > Ok, but to me it was ok as it was a link to more content: resolution, discussions with the author opened by the author of the discovery: dawid_golunski. https://www.reddit.com/r/netsec/comments/5kot1a/phpmailer_5220_remote_code_execution_cve201610045/ https://www.reddit.com/r/netsec/comments/5kot1a/phpmailer_52...
- dfc 10y agoThe author does not participate in any of the discussion there. Furthermore when you posted the link it only had 4 or 5 comments that added nothing to the discussion. The best example is this one: Https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13196875 It's the same exact link with no comments. What's the point?