4 ms·
MSSQL still doesn't have replication on Linux. Here's one data scientists hillarious take on the difference between MSSQL and Postgres: https://www.pg-versus-m
by Beltiras 10y ago
MSSQL still doesn't have replication on Linux. Here's one data scientists hillarious take on the difference between MSSQL and Postgres: https://www.pg-versus-ms.com/ https://www.pg-versus-ms.com/
- ljoshua 10y agoMSSQL is in the very new process of actually becoming available on Linux. Give'em a bit of time at least.
- Beltiras 10y agoI'm rather biased, I'll freely admit that. Having deployed some number of Django on PG solutions (some of which deliver moderate req/s) I will gravitate there just on experience alone.
- rcarmo 10y agoThat's actually about MSSQL 2014. 2016 is a substantially different beast.
- dhd415 10y agoI'm a big fan of PG and PG is good enough that it can compare favorably to MSSQL on its own merits, but that article reads more as a screed against commercial software than an objective assessment of PG's strengths relative to MSSQL. As an example, a big advantage of MSSQL for data analysis applications is its column store indexes which the author dismisses as something he doesn't use.