3 ms·
You're mistaking weight for density. You can't create mass out of nowhere. If you transform fat into muscle, you still have the same amount of the same atoms,
by ht85 10y ago
You're mistaking weight for density.
You can't create mass out of nowhere. If you transform fat into muscle, you still have the same amount of the same atoms, and thus weight the same.
- dragonwriter 10y ago> You're mistaking weight for density No, I'm not. > You can't create mass out of nowhere. Calories measure energy content, not mass. > If you transform fat into muscle, you still have the same amount of the same atoms No, you don't. > and thus weight the same. Yes, if you trade one pound of fat for one pound of muscle, weight is the same. But since fat has an energy content around 3500kcal/pound and muscle is, IIRC, around 750kcal/pound, that corresponds to more than a 2500kcal calorie deficit with no weight change.
- ht85 10y ago> it's quite possible to eat at a deficit and gain weight > since fat has an energy content around 3500kcal/pound and muscle is, IIRC, around 750kcal/pound, that corresponds to more than a 2500kcal calorie deficit with no weight change Feel free to ask a friend with chemistry or physics background why this is completely wrong and goes against everything we know about matter and energy.