> I don't think that a subreddit that bans links to Wikipedia can be considered a good source of information. I don't believe it does as I recently posted a co

> I don't think that a subreddit that bans links to Wikipedia can be considered a good source of information. I don't believe it does as I recently posted a comment with a wikipedia link. It does, however require more authoritative sources than wikipedia, mine did at least have several other corroborating sources. Perhaps the auto-mod is set to remove comments without at least one non-wiki link. They encourage people who would otherwise have linked just to wikipedia to hunt out the sources that claim comes from and use those instead. I hope they put in a note in their comment or said thanks at least, I'd hope for more there.