This document has not even been spell-checked, let alone peer reviewed. The claims in the title are sensational and false. It is neither groundbreaking research

This document has not even been spell-checked, let alone peer reviewed. The claims in the title are sensational and false. It is neither groundbreaking research, nor what would be commonly understood to be a "new equation in physics" as it does not propose any newer, more fundamental understanding of nature. The claims to be 'groundbreaking' seem to be based the belief that he has 'refuted' the ideal gas law despite the fact that this was never intended as anything other than a workable approximation. He proposes to replace the ideal gas law with a formula derived from statistical curve fitting to experimental data. I can't judge whether there is any merit in this formula or in the means by which he has derived it. Evaluating such submissions according to the crackpot index would be an ideal application of artificial intelligence as pinpointing the errors of reasoning employed by cranks is tedious and unrewarding.