3 ms·
Let's not get hung up on the $15/hr rate issue; the larger assertion is that people concentrated in cities shouldn't have a say in the management of the land th
by pklausler 10y ago
Let's not get hung up on the $15/hr rate issue; the larger assertion is that people concentrated in cities shouldn't have a say in the management of the land that's (mostly) upstream from them, and that's why a Wyoming voter should have 4x the voting power for President than a California voter.
(WY: 585,000 pop., 3 EV; CA: 38.8M pop., 55 EV).
- brightball 10y agoIt seems like moving to Wyoming to have your vote count 4x as much would be powerful thing then. Then again, your priorities might change if you live in Wyoming.
- vaishaksuresh 10y agoMy point still stands. The Wyoming voter now has 4X more say in things that affect a vast majority of people In CA. States should govern things that affect the land management in this case and federal government should not deal with that.