5 ms·

Clearly fake accounts and vote manipulation. The abstract is nonsense. Does anyone care to take the time to score the article by the Crackpot Index[1]? [1] ma

Clearly fake accounts and vote manipulation. The abstract is nonsense. Does anyone care to take the time to score the article by the Crackpot Index[1]? [1] math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html

Zuider 10y ago
This document has not even been spell-checked, let alone peer reviewed. The claims in the title are sensational and false. It is neither groundbreaking research, nor what would be commonly understood to be a "new equation in physics" as it does not propose any newer, more fundamental understanding of nature. The claims to be 'groundbreaking' seem to be based the belief that he has 'refuted' the ideal gas law despite the fact that this was never intended as anything other than a workable approximation. He proposes to replace the ideal gas law with a formula derived from statistical curve fitting to experimental data. I can't judge whether there is any merit in this formula or in the means by which he has derived it. Evaluating such submissions according to the crackpot index would be an ideal application of artificial intelligence as pinpointing the errors of reasoning employed by cranks is tedious and unrewarding.
- 792700gindgks 10y ago
  Self delusion on contours of arrogance is not helpful in long run. If so, even Thanu Padmanabhan's paper's abstract would have been elevated to be egoistic. I think, this work is to an extent a new one and I don't find any mathematical error, what say?
- onedudeone 10y ago
  Hilarious comment. Desperate enough?
792700gindgks 10y ago
Oh yeah, I think you should also be knowing how crackpot was John Baez himself. A struggling mathematician who even declared Abhas Mitra a crackpot. Are you really in self control? I've gone through many papers, using first person in abstract doesn't vote it down, point errors don't make hyperloop of your own choices buddy!!
onedudeone 10y ago
Oh yeah, I think you should also be knowing how crackpot was John Baez himself. A struggling mathematician who even declared Abhas Mitra a crackpot. Are you really in self control? I've gone through many papers, using first person in abstract doesn't vote it down, point errors don't make hyperloop of your own choices buddy!!

Clearly fake accounts and vote manipulation. The abstract is nonsense. Does anyone care to take the time to score the article by the Crackpot Index[1]? [1] math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html

Zuider 10y ago

This document has not even been spell-checked, let alone peer reviewed. The claims in the title are sensational and false. It is neither groundbreaking research, nor what would be commonly understood to be a "new equation in physics" as it does not propose any newer, more fundamental understanding of nature. The claims to be 'groundbreaking' seem to be based the belief that he has 'refuted' the ideal gas law despite the fact that this was never intended as anything other than a workable approximation. He proposes to replace the ideal gas law with a formula derived from statistical curve fitting to experimental data. I can't judge whether there is any merit in this formula or in the means by which he has derived it. Evaluating such submissions according to the crackpot index would be an ideal application of artificial intelligence as pinpointing the errors of reasoning employed by cranks is tedious and unrewarding.

792700gindgks 10y ago
Self delusion on contours of arrogance is not helpful in long run. If so, even Thanu Padmanabhan's paper's abstract would have been elevated to be egoistic. I think, this work is to an extent a new one and I don't find any mathematical error, what say?
onedudeone 10y ago
Hilarious comment. Desperate enough?

792700gindgks 10y ago

Oh yeah, I think you should also be knowing how crackpot was John Baez himself. A struggling mathematician who even declared Abhas Mitra a crackpot. Are you really in self control? I've gone through many papers, using first person in abstract doesn't vote it down, point errors don't make hyperloop of your own choices buddy!!

onedudeone 10y ago