3 ms·
Windows 2000 was dog slow even with 128MB memory. Similar like WinNT 4 under 64MB run like a pig. Or WinXP under 256MB. Of course WinNT OS series is rock solid
by frik 10y ago
Windows 2000 was dog slow even with 128MB memory. Similar like WinNT 4 under 64MB run like a pig. Or WinXP under 256MB.
Of course WinNT OS series is rock solid and cannot be compared to Win9x in that way.
- krylon 10y ago> Windows 2000 was dog slow even with 128MB memory. Indeed. A couple of years back, at a former employer, I was given a certain task that required me to set up an "office" in our assembly hall, so the only PC I was allowed to use was one that was practically part of the garbage pile anyway, which turned out to be a Pentium III 450 with 128 MHz of RAM. One of my coworkers gave the heartfelt advice to use Windows 98, but I was young and stubborn. Soon, I was young and impatient. ;-) It was fun, though, the PC had no case, it was just a PSU and a motherboard sitting on a very dusty table, which felt very macho. Fun times.
- justin66 10y ago> Windows 2000 was dog slow even with 128MB memory. I never found it so. That's pretty much the spec of my first Quake gaming rig. Of course, you omitted the CPU, which is a nontrivial detail. I remember the jump from Pentium II to a 800 MHz p3 being a big, big deal.