2 ms·
This could also be a possible explanation for this: http://www.livescience.com/10277-obesity-rise-animals.html http://www.livescience.com/10277-obesity-rise-ani
by ginko 10y ago
This could also be a possible explanation for this: http://www.livescience.com/10277-obesity-rise-animals.html http://www.livescience.com/10277-obesity-rise-animals.html
>Allison first stumbled across evidence of overweight animals while looking at data on marmosets from the Wisconsin National Primate Research Center. The average weight of the monkeys had gone up over the decades, he noticed, and there seemed to be no plausible explanation. Allison queried primate center researcher Joseph Kemnitz as to what the cause might be: Were the marmosets from a different supplier? Had they been bred to be larger? The answers were "no" and "no."
>But the monkeys' diets had been changed over the years, a switch that was well-documented by the lab. So Allison tried running the numbers again, this time controlling for the diet change.
>"It only made the results stronger," he said. With the diet change, the animals should have lost weight, if anything.
- heptathorp 10y ago> With the diet change, the animals should have lost weight, if anything. I think the far more likely explanation is that they don't have a complete understanding of nutrition and their expectations about the diet change were wrong. "But we put the marmosets on a No-Fat diet! They should be losing weight!"
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- KirinDave 10y agoFad diets a la Taubes's poorly researched book are not very popular in lab settings, where calories in/out work tends to make quantification easier. And given the low cost and overhead of fresher food, many research animals I've been involved with in a past life are pretty well compared to th humans overseeing them.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]