4 ms·

Did you read it from start to end? By order of subjects: nature conservation, global health, political and economic progress, climat change response, less viole

by ciconia 10y ago

Did you read it from start to end? By order of subjects: nature conservation, global health, political and economic progress, climat change response, less violence, sustainable economy and agriculture, endangered animals, charity. The conservation of our planet is probably the biggest challenge facing humanity, and everything else sort of ties in with it. You cannot really separate economic progress, political stability and public health from the state of the environment.

CiPHPerCoder 10y ago
> Did you read it from start to end? Yes, I did. > The conservation of our planet is probably the biggest challenge facing humanity, and everything else sort of ties in with it. Okay, you just conceded a point that negates any reasonable premise for your question that I can imagine at this time. If everything is sort of tied in with environmental concerns, then why did you think I didn't read the article from start to end? If you didn't think that, then why did you feel the need to ask if I had? I may be missing something obvious. I'd appreciate if someone could fill me in on what I missed.
- csallen 10y ago
  I didn't downvote you, but I can only assume you're being downvoted because you ignored this: By order of subjects: nature conservation, global health, political and economic progress, climate change response, less violence, sustainable economy and agriculture, endangered animals, charity. It's pretty clear that this was the main point to counter your claim that the list was dominated by a single theme, yet you ignored it and focused on something else.
  - CiPHPerCoder 10y ago
    Nature conservation, climate change response, sustainable agriculture, endangered animals. That's all under the same theme I was talking about in my comment. It's half of your list.
    - csallen 10y ago
      Not saying you're wrong, just saying you should have said that in your response to the parent, otherwise it comes off as you dodging his point.
nickpsecurity 10y ago
" and everything else sort of ties in with it. " No it doesn't. I can talk about problems and solutions on most of the list you cited without ever mentioning conservation. Conservation is a big talking point if the author is heavily biased for or against it with a personal mission to push it into people's minds. As we see in the article. I'd have probably led with global health or less violence followed by economy, political progress, agriculture, and/or charity. These are what people relate to easiest. Then, I hit them with thing that are more long-term or that they just might not care about. This setup is what I create when the audience of people in general is my priority rather than my personal, political mission.

by ciconia 10y ago

CiPHPerCoder 10y ago

> Did you read it from start to end? Yes, I did. > The conservation of our planet is probably the biggest challenge facing humanity, and everything else sort of ties in with it. Okay, you just conceded a point that negates any reasonable premise for your question that I can imagine at this time. If everything is sort of tied in with environmental concerns, then why did you think I didn't read the article from start to end? If you didn't think that, then why did you feel the need to ask if I had? I may be missing something obvious. I'd appreciate if someone could fill me in on what I missed.

csallen 10y ago
I didn't downvote you, but I can only assume you're being downvoted because you ignored this: By order of subjects: nature conservation, global health, political and economic progress, climate change response, less violence, sustainable economy and agriculture, endangered animals, charity. It's pretty clear that this was the main point to counter your claim that the list was dominated by a single theme, yet you ignored it and focused on something else.
- CiPHPerCoder 10y ago
  Nature conservation, climate change response, sustainable agriculture, endangered animals. That's all under the same theme I was talking about in my comment. It's half of your list.
  - csallen 10y ago
    Not saying you're wrong, just saying you should have said that in your response to the parent, otherwise it comes off as you dodging his point.

nickpsecurity 10y ago

" and everything else sort of ties in with it. " No it doesn't. I can talk about problems and solutions on most of the list you cited without ever mentioning conservation. Conservation is a big talking point if the author is heavily biased for or against it with a personal mission to push it into people's minds. As we see in the article. I'd have probably led with global health or less violence followed by economy, political progress, agriculture, and/or charity. These are what people relate to easiest. Then, I hit them with thing that are more long-term or that they just might not care about. This setup is what I create when the audience of people in general is my priority rather than my personal, political mission.