4 ms·
tldr; a virus, Ad-36, may or may not cause obesity in humans. > Though Dhurandhar and Atkinson have conducted several strong studies showing the contribution o
by DeBraid 10y ago
tldr; a virus, Ad-36, may or may not cause obesity in humans.
> Though Dhurandhar and Atkinson have conducted several strong studies showing the contribution of Ad-36 to fatness, skepticism remains. Atkinson says, “I remember giving a talk at a conference where I presented 15 different studies in which Ad-36 either caused or was correlated to fatness.
- dang 10y ago> may or may not I like that. We put it in the title above, as well as changing linkbait 'the' to modest 'a'. If anyone can suggest a better (i.e. more accurate and neutral) title, we can change it again.
- overgard 10y agoIn the spirit of community feedback: I dont really see how the original article was clickbait at all. "The" is appropriate since its talking about a specific virus that has a potentially novel biochemical effect not otherwise seen, and "may or may not" is literally the same thing as "could", ie, they both imply a lack of conclusive proof. The original title never claimed "all obesity" or conclusive evidence. You've mostly just made the title more wordy.
- dang 10y agoWordy? Ouch! Ok, I took out "may or may not". I disagree about "The", though. Much like "this", it's a clickbait device—somehow it grabs attention whether it deserves it or not. And it's misleading, too, because it implies there's only one of the thing.
- overgard 10y agoNo insult intended with wordy, I realize moderating is a difficult and sometimes thankless task and most calls are non-obvious, I'm just a guy with opinions. Fair enough on "the", I see your point.
- sgift 10y agoIt's amusing how you quote only the first half of the paragraph and show by that what the second half of that very same paragraph states: People ignore the results, cause they don't fit their world view. For those who do not want to search for it, here's the full paragraph: Though Dhurandhar and Atkinson have conducted several strong studies showing the contribution of Ad-36 to fatness, skepticism remains. Atkinson says, “I remember giving a talk at a conference where I presented 15 different studies in which Ad-36 either caused or was correlated to fatness. At the end of it, a good friend said to me, ‘I just don’t believe it.’ He didn’t give a reason; he just didn’t believe it. People are really stuck on eating and exercise as the only contributors to fatness. But there is more to it.” --- Edit: The next paragraph seems to be also very relevant, so again reprinted for those who do not want to click through: Dhurandhar adds, “There’s a difference between science and faith. What you believe belongs in faith and not in science. In science you have to go by data. I have faced people who are skeptical, but when I ask them why, they can’t pinpoint a specific reason. Science is not about belief, it is about fact. There is a saying—‘In God we trust, all others bring data.’”
- DeBraid 10y ago> a good friend said to me Why is a gut feeling relevant? The anecdote you were compelled to add is journalistic flare and is immaterial to the conclusion drawn from actual studies, which I quoted originally. > People ignore the results The tldr was a reference to the studies and their results...