4 ms·
If it was an error, this is the wrong way to think about things. People who had short positions with GTC limits deep into the range traveled also could have mad
by chasingsparks 16y ago
If it was an error, this is the wrong way to think about things. People who had short positions with GTC limits deep into the range traveled also could have made a bundle. The limit orders would have executed damn fast.
If this was an error though, Nasdaq (or I assume the clearing houses more precisely) are doing exactly the right thing. Imagine if they didn't reverse the orders and it came out that a wall street firm happened to make 10% on a huge position today. With the way things are, someone would break out the guillotine.
(Edit: Bias Note: I've had May Put options at 118 on SPY since Tuesday. I did not close my position, so feel free to accuse me of being jealous ;))
- Qz 16y agoOh I'm not complaining that trades are being canceled. My thing is that if it hadn't been an error, then I would have been in a good position by selling early. But since it seems to have been an error, then my selling early disqualifies me from getting the order canceled, so I lose out for making what seemed like the right move at the time.
- chasingsparks 16y agoAh okay. Then yes, I agree with you in in that case. Going from an expected single day 10% return to not a single day 10% return is unpleasant.