2 ms·
Are you sure? I don't recall XP being real time of any kind, as it was designed ground up to be general purpose and specifically did not try to incorporate real
by hvidgaard 10y ago
Are you sure? I don't recall XP being real time of any kind, as it was designed ground up to be general purpose and specifically did not try to incorporate real time.
I do remember some sort of extension that could install drivers that made it behave like a real time OS. However at that point I think seperating the control out to seperate hardware with a real time OS seems like the obvious choice, and then keeping the interface on a genereal purpose PC. Though it wouldn't be the first time a vendor made a stupid choice.
- my123 10y agoThe NT kernel has realtime scheduling priorities. It's not fully guaranteed though, and if a program with realtime priority hogs all the cores, you're screwed.