9 ms·
Actually, I looked that up because that's what I remembered using as a "DOS alternative". Seems like it was actually just a shell replacement, leaving the actua
by dguaraglia 10y ago
Actually, I looked that up because that's what I remembered using as a "DOS alternative". Seems like it was actually just a shell replacement, leaving the actual OS stuff (such as handling INT 21h requests) to the underlaying OS, whether DOS, Windows or OS/2.
I guess wee me back in the day didn't know the difference :)
- zzalpha 10y agoWell son of a gun. I assumed it was a full DOS implementation but you're right. Well TIL... 20 years later...