3 ms·
they don't 2010-03-29 - Subsequent Final Mailed 2010-03-29 - Subsequent Final Mailed 2010-03-26 - Subsequent Final Refusal Written 2010-03-02 - Teas/Em
by aschobel 16y ago
they don't
2010-03-29 - Subsequent Final Mailed
2010-03-29 - Subsequent Final Mailed
2010-03-26 - Subsequent Final Refusal Written
2010-03-02 - Teas/Email Correspondence Entered
2010-03-01 - Communication received from applicant
2010-03-01 - TEAS Response to Office Action Received
2009-09-01 - Non-final action mailed
2009-09-01 - Non-Final Action Written
2009-08-13 - Teas/Email Correspondence Entered
2009-08-13 - Communication received from applicant
2009-08-10 - TEAS Request For Reconsideration Received
2009-08-10 - Ex parte appeal - Instituted
2009-08-10 - Jurisdiction Restored To Examining Attorney
2009-08-10 - EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
2009-02-09 - Final refusal mailed
- CrazedGeek 16y agoHrm. I wonder why Omni decided it was?
- tylero 16y agoApple explicitly claims the trademark in their press releases. http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/05/03ipad.html http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/05/03ipad.html
- bbatsell 16y agoThey claim an unregistered trademark on it. ® signifies a registered trademark. ™ signifies an unregistered trademark. They can still sue to defend it as an unregistered trademark, but they'll have a harder case to prove (especially since their attempted registration was denied), and they wouldn't be entitled to the punitive damages that they could get if it was registered.