3 ms·
Engineers talking about engineers that should act ethically is good, but self limiting, and even self defeating. For every engineer that builds a terror weapon
by dba7dba 10y ago
Engineers talking about engineers that should act ethically is good, but self limiting, and even self defeating.
For every engineer that builds a terror weapon, every architect that builds a McMansion, every chef that brings out unhealthy food with not fresh ingredient, every school district that fails at educating kids adequately, there is someone with a checkbook that decides who/what gets paid for a goal. All bad or unethical product is ultimately possible because of someone writing the checkbook.
If one or even all engineers of an organization disagree and leave due to ethics, the checkbook writer will just go out and hire next batch of engineers.
In the fictional story or Star Wars, someone had money (or credits in Star Wars universe) to put the stormtroopers, Star Destroyers, Tie Fighters, a planet with beautiful tropical islands with sandy beaches and competent engineers (but often incompetent security force) to work at building the Death Star.
Sure the Emperor has the force to get it done, but in our life, someone gets to dictate what gets built with a checkbook.
So, discussing ethics in engineering is great, but even more important imho is, who writes the checks.
- zhemao 10y agoThe whole point of the article was that Galen Urso was cognizant of that fact and chose to involve himself in the project in order to introduce a fatal flaw. The people writing the checks obviously have the most power and responsibility, but that doesn't mean that engineers don't have to engage in ethical reasoning.
- haihaibye 10y ago>> just go out and hire next batch of engineers Reducing supply will increase the price, though. If people factor morality into their work, doing evil will be a bit more expensive. See eg the opposite happening with people taking low wages to work in charities and research.