3 ms·
If you think that awesome wm is bloated, try dwm on which awesome wm was historically based. The key bindings look the same. After I've noticed that I haven't u
by mlgh 10y ago
If you think that awesome wm is bloated, try dwm on which awesome wm was historically based. The key bindings look the same.
After I've noticed that I haven't used 90% of awesome wm functionality, I moved to a dwm which is basically 2k lines of readable C code in a single file and never looked back - it's so easy to configure it to do exactly what you need.
- peatmoss 10y agoI discovered that my mostly vanilla XMonad was basically the same as DWM. My only gripe with DWM is that I needed to patch the code, compile, and install my own to turn my worthless windows key into the magic window manager key. I feel like DWM takes non-configurability literally one key too far.
- eugeneionesco 10y agoI agree, it makes no sense NOT to have a ~/.dwm.conf :(
- rakoo 10y agoYes it does. It's that much code that needs to parse config files and translate it to useful configuration. Oh and of course it needs to be backwards-compatible. The dwm authors believe there already is something to write your configuration, parse it, test that its syntax is valid and use it to configure the thing: the C toolchain.
- jck 10y agoThat's the suckless philosophy. I think it's ridiculous.
- dingdingdang 10y agoWouldn't it be relatively easy to patch it to load settings from an ini file?