3 ms·
I think this is absolutely acceptable. Automatic updates are generally useful. I guess the only aspect to improve from a usability perspective would be making u
by slhck 10y ago
I think this is absolutely acceptable. Automatic updates are generally useful. I guess the only aspect to improve from a usability perspective would be making users aware of the fact that something is being downloaded in the background – think of app updates in iOS with the pie chart animation on the app icon. There could be a similar notification in macOS's menu bar.
The real problem, obviously, is that the OS itself does not know if it is tethered to a data-capped mobile connection or an unlimited fixed line. If operating systems (both on mobile and desktop computers) were built to handle the first case, the user would have an option to stop any background activity or app updates. Like a “data-capped mode” for the entire OS.
I frequently use my mobile (with limited data) to give Internet access to friends who come from abroad and therefore have no data roaming enabled. Of course, once these mobiles see they're on WiFi, they assume they can download app updates. With LTE, it's easy enough to burn through a lot of data in no time.
- jasonm23 10y agoHad I been answering the post myself, I'd say something similar. I think it's simply the fact I got directly impacted that I feel differently. That said, it's still 50/50 for me, but full OS upgrade downloads are not a simple update, and I think they should be a different opt in class. The main reason is because these are not auto applied like a regular update, and the payload is in a different realm altogether.