4 ms·

Thanks @greenyoda for pitching in, I have published another one after removing the objectionable words. https://medium.com/@pradeep_io/7-important-lessons-for-a

Thanks @greenyoda for pitching in, I have published another one after removing the objectionable words. https://medium.com/@pradeep_io/7-important-lessons-for-a-designer-834227a7f42c https://medium.com/@pradeep_io/7-important-lessons-for-a-des... Does it make a better submission? About not writing explanation, I did had the urge to write in the explanations in the article itself. But I believe making it concise and open ended is better for a discussion to listen to different perspectives. Please do let me know your point of view on the same, would love to discuss more.

greenyoda 10y ago
According to the Guidelines, the article itself needs to be interesting, independent of any discussion. If the article is not interesting, people probably won't upvote it and there will be no discussion because nobody will see it.
- brudgers 10y ago
  Right. That's why the number of tweets that make the front page of Hacker News closely approximates zero.
  - minimaxir 10y ago
    That's not a good counterexample; Tweets are sometimes the canonical source of news (which HN prefers), and news articles are just verbose blogspam of the tweet. (I believe twitter.com is a penalized domain, which I disagree with.)
    - brudgers 10y ago
      If Twitter is penalized on Hacker News, then it might be a relevant example in this context, i.e. the nature of Hacker News as implemented.