3 ms·
The French already said they could build the California high speed train for half the current estimate, or something like that. As mentioned in other comments,
by 205guy 10y ago
The French already said they could build the California high speed train for half the current estimate, or something like that. As mentioned in other comments, it's the popular opinion and government fragmentation in the US that makes this impossible. In France, the train builders and operators are nationalized (roughly) and the central government is much more powerful (not in terms of absolute power but rather in public acceptance). So in France, where high speed trains have been successful for years, the state run constructors can get eminent domain, lay track and run trains with only a few nimbys that most people ignore. Another way to see it is if Parisians want to take a high speed train through your back yard to get to the ski or sun, too bad for you. That doesn't happen in the US with weaker central government and stronger property rights (for corporations too). Japan and China are the same way (centralized command-based government).
- trome 10y agoSure, if we restricted eminent domain litigation and returned environmental impact statements to being under 75 pages (as they are legally required to be already) we could build rail much cheaper, but Trump has not said jack in regard to getting that cleaned up.
- 205guy 10y agoIt's more than just that, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirigisme https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirigisme Edited to add: there are many ways for government and economies to function.