7 ms·

The Google design, turned up a notch

58 points by madh 16y ago

fjabre 16y ago
Is there a way to hide the left hand column? I actually find it really distracting. Also in FF 3.6.3 the text is not centered vertically in the search box. It's an FF CSS issue. I've seen it a few times before.
- landyman 16y ago
  Yes, we had several people at my office say the same thing so another programmer and I wrote a couple of plugins to hide it (FX and Chrome only): http://www.seotools.com/hide-google-options/ http://www.seotools.com/hide-google-options/. I personally like the sidebar, I think the date-based filtering is great.
  - asmosoinio 16y ago
    The tool does not do the trick for me... Chrome 5.0.375.29 beta on Windows Vista. Screen shot here, the Extension seems to be enabled. http://asmo.kortis.to/misc/shot_07052010_125200.png http://asmo.kortis.to/misc/shot_07052010_125200.png I guess it's time to start using duckduckgo.com for real.
    - landyman 16y ago
      Right now, it's only enabled for google.com -- we'll be adding all the google search properties in today.
      - asmosoinio 16y ago
        Got it, thanks! I hadn't even noticed being redirected to the local page..
- tansey 16y ago
  You could install the proprietary add-on that landyman linked, or you could install this one, assuming you don't already have it: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/3682 https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/3682 Then just go to www.google.com/custom and make that your default firefox search. I found this solution more elegant, as I already used the add-on.
NiekvdMaas 16y ago
TechCrunch's take: http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/06/google-redundant-ui/ http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/06/google-redundant-ui/ (tl;dr side bar + top bar = redundancy)
tybris 16y ago
Disneyfication.
- deleted 16y ago
  [deleted]
- yanw 16y ago
  c'mon it's a much needed and a good redesign, I suppose the top navigation bar is kept unchanged for further testing, it might eventually include only non duplicate function; gmail, docs, calendar etc.
  - ugh 16y ago
    The options on the left change depending on your query. It’s not entirely redundant. Searching for facebook privacy shows Blogs first, then News, searching for new york shows Maps, News, Blogs, Images and Videos. Different options in a different order. That has advantages (displaying Maps first when searching for places seems like a great idea) but also disadvantages: options switch places and are not always immediately accessible. Keeping the top bar (where services have a fixed location and are always displayed) seems like a good compromise. Admittedly not the most elegant thing.
  - puredemo 16y ago
    Why was it much needed? What reflected this?
- sketerpot 16y ago
  This is a fully-general scornful response to any UI changes that Google could possibly have made. Or could ever make in the future. Congratulations?
icco 16y ago
I really like the color change on the homepage. I've been on the beta for this for about a month and I've enjoyed it for the most part.
abstractbill 16y ago
we tried to take all the things we strive for at Google and make them better: powerful technology, snappy results, simplicity and a fun and quirky personality Yes! This is totally what was missing for me. I had great search results from Google every time, but where was the fun? Where was the quirky personality damn it?
- keltex 16y ago
  I thought we'd done away with Quirks mode, but looks like Google has brought it back.
- gruseom 16y ago
  You make an interesting observation amid that sarcasm. Google's persona may be fun (in some ways, sort of, I guess), but their products are not. At their best, they're unobtrusive, minimal, and super functional. That's much better than "fun". The stuff people produce when they're striving to make something "fun" doesn't wear well. One other thing Google have been good at in the past is rolling back mistakes. I bet this one doesn't last long.
supaflyhigh 16y ago
I find the sidebar annoying, but perhaps more so because we have used google without it for so long. I tend to agree with techcrunch that there is redundancy in the side and top bar. New logo is good, search box is ok...but this modern style of it and the buttons seems out of place and more distracting then anything. The search features on the side are nice...but I used them so rarely in the past and don't see myself using them any more now. It seems like google wants me to spend more time searching then clicking links, when in reality I usually use google as a quick 10 second shortcut to finding info. The last time I clicked "next" on a search was........a long time ago.
- bbatsell 16y ago
  I use the time-based filtering all the time now. I didn't really expect to when I first started in the beta. It's incredibly helpful when searching on topics that undergo wholesale changes often (e.g. the vast majority of technology). Without using the filtering I get frustrated with Google results with high PR that end up being horribly outdated.
  - 10ren 16y ago
    Could you give an example of how you're using it please?
  - qeorge 16y ago
    I also use the time based filtering a lot. For example, if I want to see a recent Obama speech I missed. Its nearly impossible to find the one you want without time-based filtering.
  - _delirium 16y ago
    I've been using it for the opposite reason: I'll see something in a news story and want to search on it for some background, and all I get are 500 copies of the same news story or commentary on it. Being able to exclude anything from the past week or so makes it easier to filter all those out. It is slightly more awkward to use it that way UI-wise, though: there are quick links to press for "last X hours/days/etc.", but no quick way to get "older than X" without typing stuff into the "custom range" thing.
spot 16y ago
heh cool the first image result in there was made with my software :)
- spot 16y ago
  in fact now that i look at it, if you do an image search for "string theory" the flame algorithm was used to make #1, #4 #12 #15 #20, fully one quarter of the first page of results. it was also used to represent string theory in "molecules to the max" the educational film about nanotechnology: http://www.moleculestothemax.com/gallery_12_string.html http://www.moleculestothemax.com/gallery_12_string.html. can anyone introduce me to brian greene?
- nostrademons 16y ago
  The results were made with my software. ;-) (I've been on the team that did this since we staffed up engineers, and did the first functional demos of the new design.)
  - plinkplonk 16y ago
    "I've been on the team that did this since we staffed up engineers, and did the first functional demos of the new design." So do you think you could get us a user setting to turn off the new design and get back the classic minimalist one? Right now you have to install browser extensions etc.
    - deleted 16y ago
      [deleted]
blhack 16y ago
The search box on the left is dreadful. Why can't this be hidden the way it could (for me) yesterday? It's almost headache inducing (although that sounds crazy), it's like my eyes don't know what to do...they've had almost 10 years worth of training showing them to look in that exact spot on my screen, and now it has changed... It's really, really distracting. If I can find out a way of hiding it, I absolutely will.
- nooneelse 16y ago
  "Without change something sleeps inside us, and seldom awakens." Seriously, these threads are sounding like a bunch of angry grey-back gorillas. Our minds need to stay limber. Break up the routine. Tie the other shoe first, go to the other coffee shop, pull off the road somewhere you've never stopped before and write a poem about what you see, etc. Keep those neurons plastic and alive.
jmulder 16y ago
The biggest change in their redesign has nothing to do with the new logo, redundancy in navigation (because that can't be an issue) or making the different search tools more discoverable. The biggest change is the top left position of the first search result relative to the top left position of the document. In other words, the average scanning pattern has completely changed with the addition of a fixed side bar. It will take a lot of people a long time to adjust and its effectiveness can't be judged by a couple of hours of usage. It's not unlikely to assume Google is very willing to take a slight hit in this area and win in the discoverability of their different ways to use Google, hopefully, eventually improving a person's overal searching efficiency. Time will tell, but we all know Google tests these things through and through.
- pavs 16y ago
  > It's not unlikely to assume Google is very willing to take a slight hit in this area What hit are you talking about? Are people willing to leave Google to use another search engine and get used to their UI?. Unless they royally screw up with the design (which they didn't IMO) they have almost nothing to lose. If you compare this with bing, you will see that they have a lot of similarities.
  - deleted 16y ago
    [deleted]
  - jmulder 16y ago
    A hit in efficiency of the user when scanning the search results. And you're right. People won't leave Google over this. But Google has done extensive testing on page speed in the past and measured its long term impact on pageviews per search. I'd argue that a change in scanning patterns like this one affects the perception of speed of the interface and might impact the aforementioned metric. Overall, it should be a change for the better and i'm sure that Google wants to increase the efficiency per search to increase the overal number of unique searches a user might do -- while caring a bit less about the number of pageviews per search. As for Bing, in interface design for a company like Google --a company that effectively dominates the market and sees marginal loss of users-- the competition is irrelevant. Especially for simple UI changes such as this one. When doing a change such as this one Google is its own competitor. It needs to find a way to transition their user's habits to what they believe is a more usable one. This is by far always the hardest part and really what we are discussing right now :-) It's awesome to see though. I'd imagine it's incredbily hard to convince a board of such changes, especially in an engineering minded company such as Google.
drenei 16y ago
I really like the left side bar. I prefer it to the top bar when it comes to focusing my results - its closer and has more options. As for the design — it feels cleaner, but thats subjective.
cstuder 16y ago
They removed the trademark ((tm)) letters from the logo. I'm wondering why corporations keep plastering those all over their designs.
- mcav 16y ago
  I was under the impression that it was good practice to use those marks, primarily to make sure people know you're presenting a trademark (registered or not). Obviously Google's big enough to not need that. Legal hounds: Is there a time when one does or doesn't need the ™/®?
blehn 16y ago
From a visual standpoint, I think the most interesting change is the shading on the search bar, which makes it look raised on the page. It looks a little awkward to me, I'm sure because almost all form inputs are either flat or sunken into the page. I do think being sunken into the page is a more appropriate metaphor... I wonder how they came to that decision.
- nooneelse 16y ago
  What more appropriate metaphor is that? Writing on a piece of paper underneath the top one that I can only see a little bit of through a little window? Putting words on a shelf and the shelf needs to look like it is deep enough to hold the letters so they won't fall out the front and down the page?
  - blehn 16y ago
    Well, more like, you have two sheets of paper, the top one has labels with boxes cut out so that you write your answers on the bottom one. when you lift the top sheet off (click submit), you're left with only the raw data.
Judson 16y ago
I was actually a fan of the "horizontal bars" design they prototyped... Guess that one didn't have enough personality
puredemo 16y ago
I honestly can't stand it. I want my 100% screenspace back. Why can't I hide this fucking left panel?
abstractbill 16y ago
I just noticed this redesign removed a feature I used all the time - you used to be able to type a word into Google, and then hit the "definition" link. As far as I can see, they removed that.
- nostrademons 16y ago
  define: word still works.
karlmarks 16y ago
The single biggest change is the top ads are now barely delineated, this whole redesign is a cash and "stickiness" grab.
cia_plant 16y ago
I hid the left sidebar and expanded the results column by adding the following snippet to 'userContent.css' in my 'chrome' directory (for Firefox). @-moz-document domain(google.com) { #leftnav { display:none !important; } #center_col { margin-left: 0 !important; margin-right: 0 !important; } } I think the ads to the right were already hidden by adblock, so you may need to tweak this if you want to preserve ads for some reason.
pg 16y ago
The reason the new design is so much worse is that it uses the most valuable space on the screen, the left side (since we read left to right), for stuff users don't care much about. What users care about most on a page of search results is the search results. Those should get priority. Instead the prime space is given to stuff that's boilerplate, or only tangentially relevant, or both. I'm surprised Google would make a mistake of such magnitude. Anyone who's read Tufte would know not to do this. They've effectively reduced the data-ink ratio of the page, when you weight each pixel by its proximity to the upper left corner. http://www.infovis-wiki.net/index.php/Data-Ink_Ratio http://www.infovis-wiki.net/index.php/Data-Ink_Ratio http://inspiredimpressions.files.wordpress.com/2006/04/Google%20heat%20map.jpg http://inspiredimpressions.files.wordpress.com/2006/04/Googl... Oddly enough, it would actually be better if the left bar were entirely boilerplate, because that would make it easier to tune it out. http://www.useit.com/eyetracking/eyetracking_corporate_site_about_us.png http://www.useit.com/eyetracking/eyetracking_corporate_site_... Then the new design would merely waste space. Filling the left side of the page not merely with crap, but with changing crap, is the worst case scenario.
- johnrob 16y ago
  Does anyone know how to get rid of this new left bar?
  - plinkplonk 16y ago
    "Does anyone know how to get rid of this new left bar?" A couple of ways to do it. (1) On Firefox install the stylish plug in (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/2108/ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/2108/). Then go to http://userstyles.org/styles/29418 http://userstyles.org/styles/29418 and install the style. After installation, if you are not using google.com(say google.ca or google.co.in), edit the css (left click on icon at bottom right, select manage, select the style edit) to reflect whatever google engine you are using. (2)In Chrome the Hide Google Options addon works perfectly (http://www.seotools.com/hide-google-options/#Chrome http://www.seotools.com/hide-google-options/#Chrome). There is a firefox equivalent but for some reason it didn't work for me so I went with the above (stylish) option on FF. No idea about any other browser. Sorry. But I guess there is always GreaseMonkey?
j00lz 16y ago
As screens are now coming in a wider format i.e 16:9, there is generally a large amount of wasted space at the sides in a lot of webpages. Adding the sidebar is making better use of that space.
ck2 16y ago
Stylish plugin to the rescue! First I hide all the left column sidebar nonsense with adblock. Then I do this: #center_col {margin:0 !important;} .gl,.sla {text-decoration:underline !important;} .tsf-p {width:65% !important;} Problem solved. Back to wide.
sankara 16y ago
I'm feeling too much blue! Cached and similar links for example could have been gray instead of the blue variant. IMHO, those links need not be so prominent.
asmosoinio 16y ago
(Google Chrome): Right click on address bar / Edit Search Engines... / select Duck Duck Go / Make Default Fixed!

58 points by madh 16y ago

Is there a way to hide the left hand column? I actually find it really distracting. Also in FF 3.6.3 the text is not centered vertically in the search box. It's an FF CSS issue. I've seen it a few times before.

landyman 16y ago
Yes, we had several people at my office say the same thing so another programmer and I wrote a couple of plugins to hide it (FX and Chrome only): http://www.seotools.com/hide-google-options/ http://www.seotools.com/hide-google-options/. I personally like the sidebar, I think the date-based filtering is great.
- asmosoinio 16y ago
  The tool does not do the trick for me... Chrome 5.0.375.29 beta on Windows Vista. Screen shot here, the Extension seems to be enabled. http://asmo.kortis.to/misc/shot_07052010_125200.png http://asmo.kortis.to/misc/shot_07052010_125200.png I guess it's time to start using duckduckgo.com for real.
  - landyman 16y ago
    Right now, it's only enabled for google.com -- we'll be adding all the google search properties in today.
    - asmosoinio 16y ago
      Got it, thanks! I hadn't even noticed being redirected to the local page..
tansey 16y ago
You could install the proprietary add-on that landyman linked, or you could install this one, assuming you don't already have it: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/3682 https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/3682 Then just go to www.google.com/custom and make that your default firefox search. I found this solution more elegant, as I already used the add-on.

NiekvdMaas 16y ago

TechCrunch's take: http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/06/google-redundant-ui/ http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/06/google-redundant-ui/ (tl;dr side bar + top bar = redundancy)

tybris 16y ago

Disneyfication.

deleted 16y ago
[deleted]
yanw 16y ago
c'mon it's a much needed and a good redesign, I suppose the top navigation bar is kept unchanged for further testing, it might eventually include only non duplicate function; gmail, docs, calendar etc.
- ugh 16y ago
  The options on the left change depending on your query. It’s not entirely redundant. Searching for facebook privacy shows Blogs first, then News, searching for new york shows Maps, News, Blogs, Images and Videos. Different options in a different order. That has advantages (displaying Maps first when searching for places seems like a great idea) but also disadvantages: options switch places and are not always immediately accessible. Keeping the top bar (where services have a fixed location and are always displayed) seems like a good compromise. Admittedly not the most elegant thing.
- puredemo 16y ago
  Why was it much needed? What reflected this?
sketerpot 16y ago
This is a fully-general scornful response to any UI changes that Google could possibly have made. Or could ever make in the future. Congratulations?

icco 16y ago

I really like the color change on the homepage. I've been on the beta for this for about a month and I've enjoyed it for the most part.

abstractbill 16y ago

we tried to take all the things we strive for at Google and make them better: powerful technology, snappy results, simplicity and a fun and quirky personality Yes! This is totally what was missing for me. I had great search results from Google every time, but where was the fun? Where was the quirky personality damn it?

keltex 16y ago
I thought we'd done away with Quirks mode, but looks like Google has brought it back.
gruseom 16y ago
You make an interesting observation amid that sarcasm. Google's persona may be fun (in some ways, sort of, I guess), but their products are not. At their best, they're unobtrusive, minimal, and super functional. That's much better than "fun". The stuff people produce when they're striving to make something "fun" doesn't wear well. One other thing Google have been good at in the past is rolling back mistakes. I bet this one doesn't last long.

supaflyhigh 16y ago

I find the sidebar annoying, but perhaps more so because we have used google without it for so long. I tend to agree with techcrunch that there is redundancy in the side and top bar. New logo is good, search box is ok...but this modern style of it and the buttons seems out of place and more distracting then anything. The search features on the side are nice...but I used them so rarely in the past and don't see myself using them any more now. It seems like google wants me to spend more time searching then clicking links, when in reality I usually use google as a quick 10 second shortcut to finding info. The last time I clicked "next" on a search was........a long time ago.

bbatsell 16y ago
I use the time-based filtering all the time now. I didn't really expect to when I first started in the beta. It's incredibly helpful when searching on topics that undergo wholesale changes often (e.g. the vast majority of technology). Without using the filtering I get frustrated with Google results with high PR that end up being horribly outdated.
- 10ren 16y ago
  Could you give an example of how you're using it please?
- qeorge 16y ago
  I also use the time based filtering a lot. For example, if I want to see a recent Obama speech I missed. Its nearly impossible to find the one you want without time-based filtering.
- _delirium 16y ago
  I've been using it for the opposite reason: I'll see something in a news story and want to search on it for some background, and all I get are 500 copies of the same news story or commentary on it. Being able to exclude anything from the past week or so makes it easier to filter all those out. It is slightly more awkward to use it that way UI-wise, though: there are quick links to press for "last X hours/days/etc.", but no quick way to get "older than X" without typing stuff into the "custom range" thing.

spot 16y ago

heh cool the first image result in there was made with my software :)

spot 16y ago
in fact now that i look at it, if you do an image search for "string theory" the flame algorithm was used to make #1, #4 #12 #15 #20, fully one quarter of the first page of results. it was also used to represent string theory in "molecules to the max" the educational film about nanotechnology: http://www.moleculestothemax.com/gallery_12_string.html http://www.moleculestothemax.com/gallery_12_string.html. can anyone introduce me to brian greene?
nostrademons 16y ago
The results were made with my software. ;-) (I've been on the team that did this since we staffed up engineers, and did the first functional demos of the new design.)
- plinkplonk 16y ago
  "I've been on the team that did this since we staffed up engineers, and did the first functional demos of the new design." So do you think you could get us a user setting to turn off the new design and get back the classic minimalist one? Right now you have to install browser extensions etc.
  - deleted 16y ago
    [deleted]

blhack 16y ago

The search box on the left is dreadful. Why can't this be hidden the way it could (for me) yesterday? It's almost headache inducing (although that sounds crazy), it's like my eyes don't know what to do...they've had almost 10 years worth of training showing them to look in that exact spot on my screen, and now it has changed... It's really, really distracting. If I can find out a way of hiding it, I absolutely will.

nooneelse 16y ago
"Without change something sleeps inside us, and seldom awakens." Seriously, these threads are sounding like a bunch of angry grey-back gorillas. Our minds need to stay limber. Break up the routine. Tie the other shoe first, go to the other coffee shop, pull off the road somewhere you've never stopped before and write a poem about what you see, etc. Keep those neurons plastic and alive.

jmulder 16y ago

The biggest change in their redesign has nothing to do with the new logo, redundancy in navigation (because that can't be an issue) or making the different search tools more discoverable. The biggest change is the top left position of the first search result relative to the top left position of the document. In other words, the average scanning pattern has completely changed with the addition of a fixed side bar. It will take a lot of people a long time to adjust and its effectiveness can't be judged by a couple of hours of usage. It's not unlikely to assume Google is very willing to take a slight hit in this area and win in the discoverability of their different ways to use Google, hopefully, eventually improving a person's overal searching efficiency. Time will tell, but we all know Google tests these things through and through.

pavs 16y ago
> It's not unlikely to assume Google is very willing to take a slight hit in this area What hit are you talking about? Are people willing to leave Google to use another search engine and get used to their UI?. Unless they royally screw up with the design (which they didn't IMO) they have almost nothing to lose. If you compare this with bing, you will see that they have a lot of similarities.
- deleted 16y ago
  [deleted]
- jmulder 16y ago
  A hit in efficiency of the user when scanning the search results. And you're right. People won't leave Google over this. But Google has done extensive testing on page speed in the past and measured its long term impact on pageviews per search. I'd argue that a change in scanning patterns like this one affects the perception of speed of the interface and might impact the aforementioned metric. Overall, it should be a change for the better and i'm sure that Google wants to increase the efficiency per search to increase the overal number of unique searches a user might do -- while caring a bit less about the number of pageviews per search. As for Bing, in interface design for a company like Google --a company that effectively dominates the market and sees marginal loss of users-- the competition is irrelevant. Especially for simple UI changes such as this one. When doing a change such as this one Google is its own competitor. It needs to find a way to transition their user's habits to what they believe is a more usable one. This is by far always the hardest part and really what we are discussing right now :-) It's awesome to see though. I'd imagine it's incredbily hard to convince a board of such changes, especially in an engineering minded company such as Google.

drenei 16y ago

I really like the left side bar. I prefer it to the top bar when it comes to focusing my results - its closer and has more options. As for the design — it feels cleaner, but thats subjective.

cstuder 16y ago

They removed the trademark ((tm)) letters from the logo. I'm wondering why corporations keep plastering those all over their designs.

mcav 16y ago
I was under the impression that it was good practice to use those marks, primarily to make sure people know you're presenting a trademark (registered or not). Obviously Google's big enough to not need that. Legal hounds: Is there a time when one does or doesn't need the ™/®?

blehn 16y ago

From a visual standpoint, I think the most interesting change is the shading on the search bar, which makes it look raised on the page. It looks a little awkward to me, I'm sure because almost all form inputs are either flat or sunken into the page. I do think being sunken into the page is a more appropriate metaphor... I wonder how they came to that decision.

nooneelse 16y ago
What more appropriate metaphor is that? Writing on a piece of paper underneath the top one that I can only see a little bit of through a little window? Putting words on a shelf and the shelf needs to look like it is deep enough to hold the letters so they won't fall out the front and down the page?
- blehn 16y ago
  Well, more like, you have two sheets of paper, the top one has labels with boxes cut out so that you write your answers on the bottom one. when you lift the top sheet off (click submit), you're left with only the raw data.

Judson 16y ago

I was actually a fan of the "horizontal bars" design they prototyped... Guess that one didn't have enough personality

puredemo 16y ago

I honestly can't stand it. I want my 100% screenspace back. Why can't I hide this fucking left panel?

abstractbill 16y ago

I just noticed this redesign removed a feature I used all the time - you used to be able to type a word into Google, and then hit the "definition" link. As far as I can see, they removed that.

nostrademons 16y ago
define: word still works.

karlmarks 16y ago

The single biggest change is the top ads are now barely delineated, this whole redesign is a cash and "stickiness" grab.

cia_plant 16y ago

I hid the left sidebar and expanded the results column by adding the following snippet to 'userContent.css' in my 'chrome' directory (for Firefox). @-moz-document domain(google.com) { #leftnav { display:none !important; } #center_col { margin-left: 0 !important; margin-right: 0 !important; } } I think the ads to the right were already hidden by adblock, so you may need to tweak this if you want to preserve ads for some reason.

pg 16y ago

The reason the new design is so much worse is that it uses the most valuable space on the screen, the left side (since we read left to right), for stuff users don't care much about. What users care about most on a page of search results is the search results. Those should get priority. Instead the prime space is given to stuff that's boilerplate, or only tangentially relevant, or both. I'm surprised Google would make a mistake of such magnitude. Anyone who's read Tufte would know not to do this. They've effectively reduced the data-ink ratio of the page, when you weight each pixel by its proximity to the upper left corner. http://www.infovis-wiki.net/index.php/Data-Ink_Ratio http://www.infovis-wiki.net/index.php/Data-Ink_Ratio http://inspiredimpressions.files.wordpress.com/2006/04/Google%20heat%20map.jpg http://inspiredimpressions.files.wordpress.com/2006/04/Googl... Oddly enough, it would actually be better if the left bar were entirely boilerplate, because that would make it easier to tune it out. http://www.useit.com/eyetracking/eyetracking_corporate_site_about_us.png http://www.useit.com/eyetracking/eyetracking_corporate_site_... Then the new design would merely waste space. Filling the left side of the page not merely with crap, but with changing crap, is the worst case scenario.

johnrob 16y ago
Does anyone know how to get rid of this new left bar?
- plinkplonk 16y ago
  "Does anyone know how to get rid of this new left bar?" A couple of ways to do it. (1) On Firefox install the stylish plug in (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/2108/ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/2108/). Then go to http://userstyles.org/styles/29418 http://userstyles.org/styles/29418 and install the style. After installation, if you are not using google.com(say google.ca or google.co.in), edit the css (left click on icon at bottom right, select manage, select the style edit) to reflect whatever google engine you are using. (2)In Chrome the Hide Google Options addon works perfectly (http://www.seotools.com/hide-google-options/#Chrome http://www.seotools.com/hide-google-options/#Chrome). There is a firefox equivalent but for some reason it didn't work for me so I went with the above (stylish) option on FF. No idea about any other browser. Sorry. But I guess there is always GreaseMonkey?

j00lz 16y ago

As screens are now coming in a wider format i.e 16:9, there is generally a large amount of wasted space at the sides in a lot of webpages. Adding the sidebar is making better use of that space.

ck2 16y ago

Stylish plugin to the rescue! First I hide all the left column sidebar nonsense with adblock. Then I do this: #center_col {margin:0 !important;} .gl,.sla {text-decoration:underline !important;} .tsf-p {width:65% !important;} Problem solved. Back to wide.

sankara 16y ago

I'm feeling too much blue! Cached and similar links for example could have been gray instead of the blue variant. IMHO, those links need not be so prominent.

asmosoinio 16y ago

(Google Chrome): Right click on address bar / Edit Search Engines... / select Duck Duck Go / Make Default Fixed!