3 ms·
People don't overlook it, it's not a fundamental property of functional programming.
by Touche 10y ago
People don't overlook it, it's not a fundamental property of functional programming.
- smallnamespace 10y agoBut by that metric, you could call assembly a functional programming language and not be incorrect either. There's a core set of features that FP languages implement so that people can be productive, and rich and expressive types certainly seems a key component.