4 ms·
Who even mentioned Clinton? It's weird how a lot of conversations about the strong evidence that Russia influenced the US election are refuted with "yeah, but
by untog 10y ago
Who even mentioned Clinton?
It's weird how a lot of conversations about the strong evidence that Russia influenced the US election are refuted with "yeah, but Clinton" as if that even starts to justify the situation.
The last year has very clearly done away with the idea that Wikileaks is a non-partisan body that only pursues truth. Maybe Assange has finally gone stir-crazy in that embassy, but he's actively ruining the good name he created.
- bootlooped 10y agoHe already did a lot of damage to his name when he screwed over his friends and supporters who put up his bail by fleeing to the Ecuadorian embassy.
- zeroer 10y agoI'd be interested in reading about this "strong evidence". Seriously. But I'll I've seen is quotes from people in the US's security aparatus that we should trust them that strong evidence exists.
- evgen 10y agoThere was a significant amount of strong evidence from independent security researchers being presented publicly for months prior to the election. Maybe you should do a bit of research.