> She was a known Clinton supporter, no? No, that's part of the problem. She was a mover and shaker behind the scenes but had not formally and publicly declare

> She was a known Clinton supporter, no? No, that's part of the problem. She was a mover and shaker behind the scenes but had not formally and publicly declared an allegiance (of course, it was obvious from the way she talked on CNN). She was an ostensibly unaffiliated commentator who had a secret allegiance. It's an excellent case study of why news agencies and networks should not have paid political operators (hacks) on their payroll and the fact that it went wrong is entirely predictable.