3 ms·

You may not like or accept the evidence, but there has been plenty over the last 6 months. If you demand more, then you will likely never get it from a spearphi

by kurthr 10y ago

You may not like or accept the evidence, but there has been plenty over the last 6 months. If you demand more, then you will likely never get it from a spearphishing email dump so asking for it is pointless. https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/bears-midst-intrusion-democratic-national-committee/ https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/bears-midst-intrusion-democ... http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/12/the-public-evidence-behind-claims-russia-hacked-for-trump/ http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/12/the-public-evidence-... Do you demand the same level of proof that the emails are genuine?

3131s 10y ago
Most all of the DNC / Podesta emails are DKIM verified. That is a level of proof far beyond the word of a single security company with close ties to the FBI and the US government. I scanned through those two links you posted and I've read other interviews with Alperovitch, and I still have not seen proof that Russia was involved. Appeal to authority is not proof. With a password like "p@ssw0rd" it's not hard to imagine that many, many state-level actors and others had access to those emails.