3 ms·
You shouldn't be - all signs point to this being crackpot science. A couple of the biggest reasons are: 1. The magnitudes recorded in the several badly done ex
by akvadrako 10y ago
You shouldn't be - all signs point to this being crackpot science. A couple of the biggest reasons are:
1. The magnitudes recorded in the several badly done experiments are very small and there are plenty of possible experimental errors.
2. The original inventor's own theory of how it works plainly violates very fundamental physics, like how all frames of reference are equivalent.
There is really no reason to think this will work, except hope. Still, it's a good idea to do some more research and put the idea to rest.