4 ms·
The problem is that the user has no control over his data, so you are at the mercy of the service provider. Surprisingly, a lot of websites/services don't even
by anondon 10y ago
The problem is that the user has no control over his data, so you are at the mercy of the service provider.
Surprisingly, a lot of websites/services don't even give you the option to delete your account.
Best method to delete yourself from the internet:
* make a list of all services you are on
* if a service lets you delete your account, delete it
* if there is no delete option, email customer support and ask them to delete your account. Most sites will not create a fuss about it though it takes time and lots of back and forth with the customer support
* search for yourself on google and ask google to remove links to your profiles(social media). They won't remove links to eg- articles about you, since it does not belong to you
Depending on how generous you were with your personal info, it is most likely not possible to delete yourself completely.
Funny story: I had a LinkedIn account where I signed up with only my email ID and gave no personally identifiable info(like a fake account). A few days later I get an SMS from LinkedIn telling me person XYZ sent me a request or something. How the f_uck did you get my number? To say the least, that scared me so I deleted the account.
Also note that when a service deletes your account and data, it is more often a soft delete so your data is still with them. Good luck getting a hard deletion of your account/data.
- rawnlq 10y agoFor example you can't even delete your comments/account on hacker news
- tokenizerrr 10y agoLuckily not. I've seen what happens on Reddit when people do that, and it's awful. Come back to an old thread and it's full of [deleted] and "This comment has been deleted by a script blablabla by the way fuck you"
- CM30 10y agoThis is also why most online community/forum owners don't let users delete their own posts (or in a lot of cases, delete their account). Because it makes the content real hard to read/make sense of if some of it randomly goes missing for whatever reason.
- krapp 10y agoThat's why I prefer ephemeral threads like imageboards have. There's almost nothing about most threads that will be of any long term interest to anyone - so you might as well allow them to auto-delete after a certain time.
- kctess5 10y agoIs that so bad? Granted maybe it's annoying looking at old threads, but as a user, the ability to go through and remove old and potentially regrettable posts is quite welcome. Maybe a good compromise would be to remove the user information after a certain time period (~2 years). Hashing the username salted with the post title would be a decent way of systematically respecting user privacy while also keeping old threads readable. I wouldn't mind if HN did this.
- ryandrake 10y agoYou'd be surprised how much you could piece together with obfuscated (but still unique) usernames. I'd be in favor of your system if the hash was salted with the article's id, so that the hash of my username in one article was different than the hash of my username in a different article. One day I'm going to run for office and I'm going to have to get lawyers to scrub HN of all my comments because they have no way for users to manage their content :-)
- krapp 10y agoReally, usernames only have to be unique within a single thread, don't they? You could get away with something as simple as incremental ids in that case - user1, user2, etc.
- kctess5 10y agoYeah that was my reasoning. The salted hash would be an easy way to implement single-thread username consistency. Edit: for better readability it could be further mapped into a table of human readable handles, similar to how Google does the "Anonymous Lemur" thing in gDocs.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- tokenizerrr 10y agoYep, it's awful. I find a thread in Google and all the useful comments are gone.
- duaneb 10y agoWhy is that awful? The script obviously worked....
- duaneb 10y agoChange your name to a random hash. Should work fine.
- pepve 10y agoThat LinkedIn thing scares me too. But it might be rather simple. Person XYZ has your email and phone number in his address book, and then shares all of his contacts with LinkedIn (which they pester everyone about).
- tim333 10y agoYeah probably that. Linkedin are notorious for kind of tricking you into letting them download your contact list. I wonder what percentage of the worlds population they now have names emails and phone numbers for. Probably a good chunk.
- franciscop 10y agoIt's still a soft delete, but the best way is to fill the account with boilerplate/useless info before removing any account.
- thatwebdude 10y agoExcept when they version that crap.
- csdreamer7 10y ago> Also note that when a service deletes your account and data, it is more often a soft delete so your data is still with them. Good luck getting a hard deletion of your account/data. There are reasons for that. If the customer 'accidentally' deletes their data, and they have paid you money, restoring that account would be important for keeping their business. Also, if you have an abusive user, and they have paid for things in the past, they delete their account and file a chargeback, you can provide evidence against that user.
- nommm-nommm 10y agoEven if it's not an accident - customers change their mind next year and they don't want to start over again! You also don't want a user who gets around the moderation system by posting abusive content then deleting it when it gets reported but before moderators see it, stupid stuff like that.
- spc476 10y agoFor domains that you do control, the best way to deal with that is to: 1. Pay the domain registration for as long in advance as possible (I think it's 10 years). Also, pay for hosting of any web sites for as long as possible because: 2. Not only delete all the content, but set up the server to serve up a "410 Gone" response to every URL except for robots.txt. For that, you want: User-agent: * Disallow / The reason for the previous two steps is to inform Google (and other search engines) to remove cached copies of your sites. The robots.txt is not for search engines but for the WayBack machine. It has cached copies of your site (most likely) but if the robots.txt file disallows indexing, then it won't return any results from searches there. Sure, after your domains lapse and the new owner replaces robots.txt the stuff from your domains will be available again, but ten years might be a decent amount of time. If not, make sure you repeat as often as you can.
- MadScientist200 10y agoUse the "Account Killer" website to find out how to get accounts deleted from various services. accountkiller.com -dougl