3 ms·
> there isn't a way to test this http://mnras.oxfordjournals.org/content/162/4/307.abstract http://mnras.oxfordjournals.org/content/162/4/307.abstract discusse
by raattgift 10y ago
> there isn't a way to test this
http://mnras.oxfordjournals.org/content/162/4/307.abstract http://mnras.oxfordjournals.org/content/162/4/307.abstract discusses observables of such metrics, especially Gödel's.
A 2009 overview (postdating COBE, for example): http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/354/meta;jsessionid=C50D86D551078F7362D891E41716CA7B.c4.iopscience.cld.iop.org http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/35... (preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/0902.4575 https://arxiv.org/abs/0902.4575)
> 2/3 LIGO detections imply one of the merging pair of black holes should be a naked singularity.
Where did you get that from?
It's sure not prominent on the caltech or mit sites, or indeed in Pretorius et al. https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.08955 https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.08955