4 ms·
Go's standard library is excellent. I've found Gorilla Mux to nicely augment net/http and not feel like I'm wrapping magic around idiomatic Go. The only other 3
by transitorykris 10y ago
Go's standard library is excellent. I've found Gorilla Mux to nicely augment net/http and not feel like I'm wrapping magic around idiomatic Go. The only other 3rd party package I routinely use is sqlx.
http://www.gorillatoolkit.org/pkg/mux http://www.gorillatoolkit.org/pkg/mux
https://github.com/jmoiron/sqlx https://github.com/jmoiron/sqlx
- notheguyouthink 10y agoI literally found out about sqlx a few moments before coming here. I was stringing together ~10 columns by hand, and then when i fed them into the `row.Scan()` method, i just about rage quit. On Monday i'm going to try integrating sqlx and see how i like it. Any other good sql libs i should know about? My coworkers mostly like sql by hand, so no magic ORMs preferably. But unmarshalling rows seems like an absolute requirement.. this is just anarchy without it.
- bitexploder 10y agoGorm. Give it a try. Light on magic. Can write by hand easily still. If you arent writing really complex queries and are just shuffling records around Gorm makes life a joy. It is no SQL alchemy but for most SQL users ORM/SRM makes life better. Anyway I think most systems using SQL in business logic end up implementing a relational mapper, just not as well as battle tested mappers. But some use cases do justify avoiding such tools.
- rhodysurf 10y agoLove mux, its super simple and still lets me use the standard library way of making web apps
- amenghra 10y agoGive Squalor (https://github.com/square/squalor https://github.com/square/squalor) a shot. You might find https://github.com/relops/sqlc https://github.com/relops/sqlc really nice from an API design point of view (inspird by jOOQ, a Java sql library). Sqlc is no longer under development, but you can easily use it as a reference to adapt other libraries to have a similar API.