3 ms·
>That should be a non-issue unless you require one of those libraries. That's kind of a truism, isn't it? I don't understand the dismissiveness - there's certa
by bendmorris 10y ago
>That should be a non-issue unless you require one of those libraries.
That's kind of a truism, isn't it? I don't understand the dismissiveness - there's certainly a sizable portion of users that use libraries other than the top 50 most popular.
- m45t3r 10y agoThere is ton of new interesting libraries being compatible with Python 3 only, so you can make this argument in either way. In the end, you should ask yourself some questions: Am I starting a new project or continuing an older one? If the former one, Python 3 should be preferred unless some library I need is only available for Python 2. If the latter, I should ask if the cost of migrating my codebase makes sense. If not, Python 2 is still a viable choice until 2020 at least.