5 ms·
So you're basically saying someone who is in some kind of minority or has some kind of special hardship or toxic people or family in their life that make them p
by PavlovsCat 10y ago
So you're basically saying someone who is in some kind of minority or has some kind of special hardship or toxic people or family in their life that make them prefer to stay anonymous, but who still want to mingle and make friends and speak their mind freely are just out of luck? This, and other things, is what it wouldy imply.
Another thing it implies is that police are so shitty -- or their superiors so in cahoots with the entitities that do the murdering for that matter -- that they absolutely need to have the self-incriminating stuff someone might spout in public or they can't do their job. Have they given up on catching dangerous people who, uhm, might not do any of that, ever? If someone posts on Facebook that they're going to do a bombing, they might repeat it to the people they ask for directions there, so why fret about those of all people?
Maybe, just maybe, because it's not about catching the worst criminals in the least intrusive way possible, but using those crimes as a stepping stones to get to the innocent? Dress it up however you want it, at the end of the day this is the bottom line for over a decade. If it was about catching mass murderers someone would have arrested people like Bush and Blair by now, so that's kind of a clue to anyone seriously interested in the subject matter :P