2 ms·
Worth a read, or at the very least a look: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racket_(programming_language) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racket_(programming_languag
by Dinius 10y ago
Worth a read, or at the very least a look: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racket_(programming_language) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racket_(programming_language)
- no_protocol 10y agoThanks. To the creator of this site: Take into consideration the commonality between all of these: https://www.python.org/ https://www.python.org/ https://golang.org/ https://golang.org/ https://www.rust-lang.org/ https://www.rust-lang.org/ https://dlang.org/ https://dlang.org/ http://elm-lang.org/ http://elm-lang.org/ http://plt-scheme.org/ http://plt-scheme.org/ Each of these language homepages clearly explains that they are introducing a programming language. This new racket-lang.org page doesn't. It has a huge impact on what users will think when they load the page. The PLT Scheme homepage is leagues better than the new Racket one because it tells me exactly what it is for. Don't let yourselves go backwards.
- egeozcan 10y agohttps://www.rust-lang.org/ https://www.rust-lang.org/ is the best example. There is a code example, clear links to documentation and source, a concise description, easy to see links to most common places. Very, very good.