3 ms·
same applies on counting human photos on social site altogether (flickr, facebook, tweetpic, etc.) would be far more than 6,819,100,000 (population of the world
by tzury 17y ago
same applies on counting human photos on social site altogether (flickr, facebook, tweetpic, etc.) would be far more than 6,819,100,000 (population of the world - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_population http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_population)
- TallGuyShort 17y agohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_population http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_population <- Anyone know the reason for the UN's low and medium estimates having serious downturns in population in the next century? Is it because of lowering child-birth rates, or because of expectations of resources/diseases, etc...?
- showerst 17y agoAccording to the PDF: http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/longrange2/WorldPop2300final.pdf http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/longrange2/Wor... it's virtually all due to changes in fertility. As countries grow in wealth and life expectancy, the number of children per woman tends to drop off drastically.
- ganley 17y agoIt's due to zombie apocalypse. Duh.
- Sukotto 17y agoKeep in mind that every picture on that site is hand-made. The instructions disallow photos of actual giraffes or images created on/by a computer. How many drawings and human-shaped sculpture are there on those social sites? I doubt there's more than the 6.8 billion you quote from wikipedia.