4 ms·
Let me clarify: not performant in any way that we want to implement. The NetApp referenced in that analysis would cost as much as we've spent on both of our Op
by chrissnell 10y ago
Let me clarify: not performant in any way that we want to implement. The NetApp referenced in that analysis would cost as much as we've spent on both of our OpenStack and Kube clusters. NetApp is great if you're a hospital or a bank but not an internet company.
We need something built on common PC chassis, either as distributed local storage or some type of high speed interconnect.
- otterley 10y agoStorage is definitely one of those businesses where "fast, good, cheap: pick any two" has always applied, and still does.
- rickycook 10y agoand as an industry, we are tending towards fast, cheap, and you can write code to work around not having "good"
- bottled_poe 10y agoIn my experience, if it isn't good relatively quickly, it certainly doesn't remain cheap for long.
- user5994461 10y agoIt's not so much about the code as having a usage that can accommodate being run on "not good". Banks and hospitals don't.