3 ms·
Since reading it maybe 6 or 7 years ago, I've thought Principles is a great handbook for personal reflection and self-improvement, especially in that it continu
by leroy_masochist 10y ago
Since reading it maybe 6 or 7 years ago, I've thought Principles is a great handbook for personal reflection and self-improvement, especially in that it continually guides all discussion back to the lodestar of thinking for oneself and asking "is this true?".
However, I'd also say that Principles is a lousy "how to manage people" manual, because it tries to algorithmically describe how to deal with unpleasant interactions that require emotional intelligence, and harps really hard on the concept of "the truth will set you free and if you can't handle the truth you need to GTFO of our culture". Reading this article has reinforced that opinion.
Two other random observations here:
- These guys are a big Palantir client...I wonder if Palantir has any role in building this new system. They weren't mentioned in the article.
- Isn't "Overseer" is a really, really fucking bad formal job title for anyone at any organization?
- zzrg 10y agoI assume "overseer" is a bit tongue in cheek.
- turc1656 10y ago> Isn't "Overseer" is a really, really fucking bad formal job title for anyone at any organization? Yeah. At my company we just include anyone who would fit that billing as a member of the Panopticonal Oversight Committee so that they can also keep their regular title.