3 ms·
The common man was given a choice for voting for someone who was proven to be against their interests vs. someone who had yet to prove themselves against their
by rando444 10y ago
The common man was given a choice for voting for someone who was proven to be against their interests vs. someone who had yet to prove themselves against their interests.
Perhaps the common man was taken for a sucker, but with Hillary rigging the DNC and colluding with the media, the people were not given much of a choice.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- krapp 10y agoHad any real scrutiny been paid to Trump's business dealings or numerous lawsuits, his newly minted persona of anti-establishment populist hero of the people might have seemed as fake to the stereotypical "common man" as it did to everyone else. He publicly supported Hillary Clinton for President and praised her work as Secretary of State before he was running against her... ...and then suddenly she's the most corrupt, incompetent and evil person ever to hold American public office, and Trump would never want to align himself with the system she represents. When exactly did Trump prove he was for the common man and against the system?