3 ms·
And yet it is actually extremely content-rich, with a very good signal-to-noise ratio. For a free product whose only monetization scheme appears to be dev job a
by tdumitrescu 10y ago
And yet it is actually extremely content-rich, with a very good signal-to-noise ratio. For a free product whose only monetization scheme appears to be dev job ads and clearly-marked sponsored technical posts, it is really quite useful to have in my inbox every week. I also find myself browsing the archives not infrequently, and the generally no-frills UI makes it much easier to use for that purpose than most fancy custom content UIs. HTTP+HTML are already _quite good_ for browsing hyperlinked textual content.
- petercooper 10y agoThank you, that's very kind. If you have suggestions, please do just reply to an issue. We're improving the sites substantially for next year, but don't worry, no JS frameworks will get involved, all plain and fast HTML (just a better layout).
- mercer 10y agoYour emails are among the few that I consistently open. Thanks for doing what you do!
- reitoei 10y agoAlways look forward to this and Ruby Weekly. Thanks Peter!
- lolptdr 10y agoYour newsletter is one of the best out there, keep up the good work. I like the minimalism and the one-liner summaries are exact and succinct.
- simooooo 10y agoI should say I am also a subscriber, I'm not trying to shit on the contents. Literally the combo of underlined main link then the paragraph underneath and the author in lighter grey looks just like a Google ad/dodgy search engine.