I don't think the issue is whether automation and globalization are able to create more wealth in absolute, but whether the resulting wealth is distributed fair

I don't think the issue is whether automation and globalization are able to create more wealth in absolute, but whether the resulting wealth is distributed fairly (or effciently). If a company is able to automate its facilities to achieve 2X profits with half the workers, you'll have an higher overall GPD, but the created wealth will be shared by a reduced number of people. People struggling to make a living won't give a damn whether TV has 3 channels or 300, they can travel cheaply around the world and there is a new smartphone model every year. This has been sustainable up until technological advancement still allowed for enough decently paid unskilled jobs, but it's clear we are past this point. We are running out of, as you say, "things for people to do". I don't think these trends can or should be reversed (because they have undeniable benefits), but how to deal with the consequences is a real challenge.