4 ms·
I like how Firefox multiprocess has evolved and continues to evolve taking measurements into account. When multiprocess was announced several years ago, my mai
by newscracker 10y ago
I like how Firefox multiprocess has evolved and continues to evolve taking measurements into account.
When multiprocess was announced several years ago, my main worry was that it would be a Chrome clone with one process per tab and become sluggish like Chrome (my general use of browsers is a minimum of 10 tabs and on certain machines a lot, lot more). Finding a balance between responsiveness, security and stability is what I'd prefer. I personally don't see many stability issues in Firefox even without multiprocess. So I'm happy with this progress even though it may seem slow to dime people or that Firefox isn't keeping up with Chrome (the latter is meaningless for my use since Firefox and it's extensions provide a lot more).
- newscracker 10y agoI hate typos, and can't edit the comment anymore. The last sentence should read: So I'm happy with this progress even though it may seem slow to some people or that Firefox isn't keeping up with Chrome (the latter is meaningless for my use since Firefox and its extensions provide a lot more).