3 ms·
i'm not sure what uber's intention was, but there's a silver lining: 1) The barrier to entry in this space is somewhat low and now it's higher. Within 4 months
by rahimiali 10y ago
i'm not sure what uber's intention was, but there's a silver lining:
1) The barrier to entry in this space is somewhat low and now it's higher. Within 4 months, a small talented group can build a decent self-driving system from scratch. The DMV's action might have a (slight) chilling affect on small self-driving car operations, and gives (a small) advantage to big operations like Uber.
2) If uber thought their launch was a failure (maybe the supervisors had to intervene too often), scuttling the launch in this way buys them some time to incorporate the lessons they learned from their brief foray.
- jayjay71 10y ago"Within 4 months, a small talented group can build a decent self-driving system from scratch." What makes you think that? It's a lot more work than that. For starters, self-driving cars still aren't a commercial reality despite decades of research and many many millions of dollars in funding. I've never heard of a team build anything other than a super limited prototype in that time frame - nothing anyone would reasonably call a self-driving car.